The right hay rake for your operation is determined by three variables: annual hectarage, tractor specification, and crop type. Everything else — brand, wheel count, drive type — follows from those three. Buying a rake on brand name or because it matches what a neighbouring farm runs is how operations end up with equipment that is either oversized and underused, or insufficient for peak production demand.

This guide works through the decision in the correct order, from capacity requirement to specific model selection.

Hay rake selection guide for farm operations comparing capacity and working width

Step 1 — Calculate Your Required Throughput

Working backwards from your annual harvest area and weather window gives a target ha/h figure that defines the minimum rake capacity you need.

Formula: Required ha/h = Total annual area (ha) ÷ [Available raking hours per season]

Available raking hours = (Number of suitable weather days) × (Hours per day at working conditions). For most temperate operations with 2–3 cuts per year, plan for 4–8 good raking days per cut, 6–8 hours per day. That gives 48–192 hours per cut — applied to your total area, this sets your minimum throughput target.

Example: 150 ha operation, 3 cuts/year, 5 raking days per cut, 7 hours/day = 105 available raking hours per cut. Required throughput: 150 ha ÷ 105 h = 1.43 ha/h minimum. A 6.0 m wheel rake at 10 km/h covers 5–6 ha/h at 85% field efficiency — this farm has significant headroom at that width, meaning a 4.0–5.0 m rake is sufficient and a smaller investment is justified.

Step 2 — Match Rake Width to Mower Cut Width and Baler Pickup

Rake working width must sit between two bounds: it should be equal to or wider than your mower’s cut width (to avoid leaving unraked strips), and it must produce a windrow narrow enough for your baler’s pickup to handle without overflow.

Most round balers use a pickup width of 1.8–2.4 m. Square balers typically 2.0–2.6 m. The rake’s windrow width — adjustable via wheel angle — should be set to 60–75% of baler pickup width. A 9.0 m rake can form a windrow of 1.4–2.0 m depending on wheel angle and crop volume, which is within the range of all standard baler pickups.

Step 3 — Evaluate Drive Type Against Crop Profile

Drive type is not a preference decision — it is a technical one based on crop characteristics and tractor capability.

نوع درایو Best Crop Fit Leaf Loss Heavy/Wet Material Capital Cost
Ground-driven wheel rake Hay, legumes, straw Low Moderate Low–Medium
PTO rotary rake Grass, silage, heavy crops Moderate–High High Medium–High
Mower-rake combination Grass, silage; narrow weather windows Low (no re-raking) High High
Hydraulic rotary Large operations, variable crop density Moderate Very high High

Step 4 — High Capacity Rakes: When Width Matters More Than Type

At annual production volumes above 300–400 ha, the throughput gap between a 6.0 m and a 9.0 m rake becomes economically significant. The difference between the two at 10 km/h and 85% field efficiency is approximately 2.5 ha/h — enough to save 60–80 hours per season on a 300 ha operation, or reduce raking to a single operator across 2–3 fewer days per cut.

High-capacity options at 9.0 m include the 9LZY-9.0 finger type hay rake and the 9LZD-9.0 finger wheel rake. At 12.0 m, the 9LH-12 horizontal rake delivers rated output of 6–12 ha/h — but requires adequate tractor HP and open paddock geometry to operate efficiently. Paddock widths under 200 m substantially reduce field efficiency on a 12.0 m machine because headland turn time represents a larger proportion of total operating time.

Step 5 — Evaluating Build Quality and Maintenance Requirements

The components that wear on a finger wheel rake are the tines, tine hubs, and wheel bearings. Check the following before committing to a model:

  • Tine material: Spring steel tines (65Mn or equivalent) resist fatigue better than mild steel. Check that replacement tines are available and priced reasonably — a rake where tine replacements are expensive or on long lead times will cost more over its operational life.
  • Hub sealing: Sealed-for-life wheel hubs require no greasing and are less prone to soil ingress in dusty conditions. Grease nipple hubs are acceptable if there is a defined maintenance schedule.
  • Frame material: Heavy-section steel tubing (minimum 5 mm wall thickness on main frame members) for machines operating over 9.0 m width. Thin frame sections flex under load and fatigue at welded joints in long-term use.
  • Wheel angle adjustment: Mechanical screw adjustment is adequate; hydraulic adjustment adds cost but allows on-the-go windrow width changes. Only relevant if your operation switches frequently between crops or baler types.

Hay Rake Brands: What to Know

The hay rake market includes European OEM brands (H&S, Krone, Pöttinger, Claas), North American brands (Bush Hog, Case IH), and Asian manufacturers supplying direct-export machines. Brand selection affects parts availability and after-sales support, which matters most when a breakdown occurs mid-harvest.

For export markets — Australia, South America, Southeast Asia — sourcing directly from a manufacturer with international logistics capability reduces landed cost substantially versus buying European or North American OEM equipment at local dealer prices. The critical questions are: lead time to spare parts, and whether the manufacturer can provide a local service contact in your region.

Our hay rake range ships to Australia, New Zealand, South America, Southeast Asia, and the Middle East with commercial documentation and container loading handled from the manufacturing facility. Contact [email protected] for a delivery timeline and landed cost estimate to your port.

Mid-Sized Rakes: The Most Practical Choice for Most Operations

Rakes in the 6.0–9.0 m range represent the most broadly applicable option for commercial hay operations producing 100–500 ha annually. They are compatible with tractors in the 40–65 HP range, transport on standard farm trailers or fold to road-legal width, and can be operated by a single person without additional labour. Operations outside this band — very small farms under 30 ha or very large operations over 500 ha per cut — benefit from recalibrating to a narrower or wider model respectively.

Mid-sized 6 to 9 metre hay rake operating in commercial hay field forming windrow

سوالات متداول

What is the best hay rake for a small farm?

For operations under 50 ha annually with a tractor in the 25–45 HP range, a ground-driven finger wheel rake in the 3.0–6.0 m range is the most cost-effective choice. It requires no PTO, is simple to maintain, and produces a clean windrow with low leaf loss across hay, straw, and legume crops.

How do I know if I need a high-capacity rake?

If your current rake cannot complete the raking workload within your available weather window — raking is falling behind the mower, or you are raking in marginal conditions because there is no time left — you either need a wider rake or a second rake pass is being skipped, which damages bale quality. Calculate required ha/h as described above, then check whether your current width meets it.

What working width should I choose?

Start with your mower cut width and work up. The rake should cover at least the mower cut width in a single pass. Then check tractor HP compatibility at that width. Finally, confirm that windrow width from the rake is within the baler pickup range. This three-way constraint — mower, tractor, baler — defines the correct rake width more accurately than any rule of thumb.

Is a hydraulic hay rake better than a ground-driven one?

Not categorically. Hydraulic rakes add convenience — on-the-go angle adjustment, powered fold for transport — but also add cost, hydraulic circuit demand on the tractor, and additional components that can fail. For operations where windrow width is set once per season and rarely changed, a mechanical adjustment wheel rake is more reliable and cheaper to maintain. Hydraulic adjustment earns its cost only in operations that regularly switch between crop types or baler configurations mid-season.

Used vs new hay rakes — when does buying used make sense?

Used rakes are worth considering if: the machine is inspectable in person, tines and hubs are in known condition, and replacement parts are available for that model. The main risk with used wheel rakes is bent frame geometry from a collision — a deformed frame forces wheels out of their designed angle, producing an inconsistent windrow that cannot be corrected by adjustment. Check that all wheels track parallel and that the main frame is square before purchasing used.

Ready to specify a rake for your operation? Send us your annual hectarage, tractor HP, and crop type and we will recommend the correct model with a formal quotation including landed cost to your port or address.

View All Hay Rake Models

Email for a Quote